The Interdisciplinary Impact of the Quantification of Everything Method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202552s

Keywords:

Axiomatics, Multiple axiomatics, Economics, Q.E. method, Fuzzy logic

Abstract

The Quantification of Everything (Q.E.) methodology is a three-step process designed to transform theoretical concepts into mathematical representations and validate the resulting models through the principle of multiple axiomatics. This methodology integrates algorithms and computational techniques, often involving a large number of estimations. Its application spans various scientific disciplines; in this context, has been illustrated its use in the field of economics. A distinctive feature of the Q.E. methodology is its ability to convert empirical theoretical concepts into tractable mathematical forms by utilizing virtual quantity data. This function is especially useful in domains such as the social sciences, where empirical data may be limited or entirely unavailable. By enabling the generation of virtual datasets to test theoretical models, the methodology offers a structured approach for translating qualitative insights into quantitative terms and deriving corresponding mathematical expressions. In summary, the Q.E. methodology is a robust and adaptable framework applicable across all epistemic domains.

References

Challoumis, C. (2024). The Q.E. (Quantification of Everything) Method: Transforming Qualitative Data Across Scientific Disciplines. PaKSoM 2024, 111–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.

Ashraf, Z., Roy, M. L., Muhuri, P. K., & Lohani, Q. M. D. (2020). Interval type-2 fuzzy logic system based similarity evaluation for image steganography. Heliyon, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03771.

Běhounek, L., & Majer, O. (2018). Fuzzy intensional semantics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2018.1525207.

Challoumis, C. (2018). Methods of Controlled Transactions and the Behavior of Companies According to the Public and Tax Policy. Economics, 6(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2018-0003.

Challoumis, C. (2019). Transfer Pricing Methods for Services and the Policy of Fixed Length Principle. Economics and Business, 33(1), 222–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2019-0016.

Challoumis, C. (2020). Analysis of the Theory of Cycle of Money. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, 23(2), 13–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/acta-2020-0004.

Challoumis, C. (2020). The Impact Factor of Education on the Public Sector – The Case of the U.S. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 13(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.25103/ijbesar.131.07.

Goswami, M., & Purkayastha, B. S. (2020). A Fuzzy Based Approach for Empirical Analysis of Unstructured Data. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2020.9080.

Gupta, C., Jain, A., & Joshi, N. (2018). Fuzzy Logic in Natural Language Processing - A Closer View. Procedia Computer Science, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.052.

Jiang, X., Ding, H., Shi, H., & Li, C. (2020). Novel QoS optimization paradigm for IoT systems with fuzzy logic and visual information mining integration. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(21). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04020-3.

Lule, E., Mikeka, C., Ngenzi, A., & Mukanyiligira, D. (2020). Design of an IoT-based fuzzy approximation prediction model for early fire detection to aid public safety and control in the local urban markets. Symmetry, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12091391.

Rodionov, M. A., Akimova, I. V., & Shabanov, G. I. (2017). Elements of "fuzzy logic" as a component of professional and pedagogical training of future mathematics and informatics teachers. Integration of Education, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.087.021.201702.286-302.

Sajid, N. A., Afzal, M., & Qadir, M. (2016). Multi-label classification of computer science documents using fuzzy logic. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v44i2.7996.

Schivo, S., Scholma, J., van der Vet, P. E., Karperien, M., Post, J. N., van de Pol, J., & Langerak, R. (2016). Modelling with ANIMO: Between fuzzy logic and differential equations. BMC Systems Biology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-016-0286-z.

Spolaor, S., Fuchs, C., Cazzaniga, P., Kaymak, U., Besozzi, D., & Nobile, M. S. (2020). Simpful: A user-friendly python library for fuzzy logic. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.201012.002.

Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers and Education, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698.

Varzi, A. C., & Haack, S. (1998). Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. The Philosophical Review, 107(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2998452.

Yen, J., & Langari, R. (1999). Fuzzy Logic: Intelligence, Control, and Information. Prentice Hall.

Yudanto, A. Y., Apriyadi, M., & Sanjaya, K. (2013). Optimalisasi Lampu Lalu Lintas dengan Fuzzy Logic. Jurnal ULTIMATICS, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31937/ti.v5i2.322.

Zimmermann, H. J. (2010). Fuzzy set theory. In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics (Vol. 2, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.82.

Published

2026-01-05

How to Cite

Challoumis, C. (2026). The Interdisciplinary Impact of the Quantification of Everything Method. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202552s

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>